<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mono N-alkylation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pmgb.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/n-alkylation-of-primary-amines-to-secondary-amines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pmgb.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/n-alkylation-of-primary-amines-to-secondary-amines/</link>
	<description>chemical reaction procedures</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:18:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://pmgb.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/n-alkylation-of-primary-amines-to-secondary-amines/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmgb.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-132</guid>
		<description>iodo is better leaving group the rxn could just be run longer in the case of hindered bromides.
the reason yeilds are low is water in inhibiting the sn2 reaction.
also noted the higher dielectric constant aprotic solvents give better yeilds and selectivity
condidered dimethyl sulfone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iodo is better leaving group the rxn could just be run longer in the case of hindered bromides.<br />
the reason yeilds are low is water in inhibiting the sn2 reaction.<br />
also noted the higher dielectric constant aprotic solvents give better yeilds and selectivity<br />
condidered dimethyl sulfone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pmgb</title>
		<link>http://pmgb.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/n-alkylation-of-primary-amines-to-secondary-amines/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>pmgb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmgb.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-19</guid>
		<description>There is a typo - we took one eq. of bromide. The yield is variable with our substrates. Sometimes we improved the yields to 40-50% by adding 1 eq. sodium iodide or tetrabutylammionium iodide (TBAI) to the reaction mixture. With activated halides (benzylic chlorides/sodium iodide system) we obtained the products of mono N-alkylation in excellent yields.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a typo &#8211; we took one eq. of bromide. The yield is variable with our substrates. Sometimes we improved the yields to 40-50% by adding 1 eq. sodium iodide or tetrabutylammionium iodide (TBAI) to the reaction mixture. With activated halides (benzylic chlorides/sodium iodide system) we obtained the products of mono N-alkylation in excellent yields.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gilgerto</title>
		<link>http://pmgb.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/n-alkylation-of-primary-amines-to-secondary-amines/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>gilgerto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmgb.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-14</guid>
		<description>First why using only around 0.5 Eq of the bromide abd the get a very bad 15% yield? The origiginal paper in JOC (67, 674) states over 1 Eq of the bromide. Cesium effect for mono alkylation of primary amines is a great concept on paper but did&#039;nt work well in my hands, but I know poeple who used this methodology with succes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First why using only around 0.5 Eq of the bromide abd the get a very bad 15% yield? The origiginal paper in JOC (67, 674) states over 1 Eq of the bromide. Cesium effect for mono alkylation of primary amines is a great concept on paper but did&#8217;nt work well in my hands, but I know poeple who used this methodology with succes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
